Keeping with the tradition of “Manly Mondays” I thought I’d dedicate today to penises because, well, you know, men have them and women don’t. Penises. They’re everywhere. And, if you’re even 50% less naïve than I was the first time that I started seeing them, you probably all ready know that not all penises look the same. Uncircumcised penises (with foreskins) look quite different than circumcised ones. And—again, if you’re less naïve than I used to be—you probably all ready know that American men are circumcised, but most of their brethren in other parts of the world aren’t.
Yes, folks, it’s true: international hotdogs come with buns.
Besides appearance, of course–is there really any difference between cut and uncut? If you live outside of the US, tell me, are the men in your country cut? And, finally … cut or uncut – what’s your preference?
{ 329 comments… read them below or add one }
← Previous Comments
Dear Bob,
“Cause seriously, I won’t deal with that nasyness.” ? Really, because I don’t think I have ever seen a “nasty” vagina. I have been around a few that could use a little t.l.c. and a little less yeast, but I found a way to love those too. I know a lot of gay men that think they are disgusting. Most straight guys think they are the most beautifull and tasty things in the world. But I did pay attention and worry about my showering habits in high school, beacause I knew women did not like stinky, grimey men. But maybe you were to busy being “straight” to worry about what was attractive to women.
im uncut and i dont realy like it, my gf gave me oral but im her first so… idk she says she doesnt care about it but im still shy like if some guys would talk about it in class and stuff =( i herd there is a way to like pull ur foreskin back and if u do it a lot it will stay like that forever…any help thx
Peter:
I’d have to wonder, why don’t you like it? If there’s nothing wrong with it, why not leave it the way it is?
i know there is nothing i can to about it but like for ex: its hard to put on a condom couse like when il have sex it gets stuck with the forskin going up and downs and stuff
I’m uncut and never had an infection… Its always clean and never had any of the problems mentioned here…. I guess thats the benefit of taking a shower everyday =P hahaha…. and when it comes to having sex, when an uncut penis gets hard, the skink pulls back! so its almost just like having an uncut.
I’m sorry, but I think cut is the way to go. When a guy is hard you can’t tell the difference but, when the sex is over and the guy is uncut it looks disgusting.
Just my point of view.
I married a cut man.
Hygiene? Once a day, pull it out of your pants, skin it back, and rinse the end with a bit of drinking water. I would argue that it’s easier to clean an uncut than your hands. Hell, you can probably use for this purpose water that’s not fully safe to drink. Sex? Rinse of the end with skin pulled back before getting down to business. BTW, it is completely cool if he and she shower together before spending some quality time together in bed.
Being intact can make her less eager to do BJ. But it also makes HJ a lot more thrilling for him and her. The jury is still out on whether uncut improves vaginal, but some ladies who’ve had both swear that it does.
The foreskin is Mother Nature’s nod towards the feminine when she designed the male body. Just as the clitoris is her nod towards the masculine when she designed men. Science tells us the foreskin is akin to the hood of the clitoris, but I prefer to think of it as being like the inner lips. I find ample inner lips hot, and invite ladies to think the same way about the foreskin. I also notice that the rare large clit looks a lot like an uncut penis.
It’s not hard to find explicit images of transsexuals who don’t have their pink bits operated on. To my eye, a circumcised transsexual jars my eye; my brain says “this does not compute.” But an intact trannie somehow does not clash; a female looking body plus an intact penis somehow adds up to something harmonious. This has convinced me that the foreskin gives a soft feminine touch to what is otherwise a male tool. Even though I am a str8 male, I welcome this feminine touch, and invite American ladies to see things that way. And judging from YouTube, I think they are coming around to this point of view.
I’m circumcised and it sucks. My head is dry and the sensitivity has declined. I heard there are nonsurgical ways to get a foreskin and I began to research it heavily. There is a product called the TLC Tugger and it helps regrow foreskin with tensile tissue expansion. I’m going to purchase that soon because I hate when a girl has more pleasure than I do. I’m sure girls loved an uncut penis in 500 BC.
“I’m sure girls loved an uncut penis in 500 BC.”
I agree. I think the only reason some people think uncut is gross is just social conditioning, which would only be true in a culture where circumcision is common. Indeed, it seems that people from Europe generally have no qualms over an uncut pens because they haven’t been taught that an uncut penis is gross.
it doesnot matter weather u are cut or uncut . its all good…..
by the way i think un cut men tend to be more higenic. in the sense that they will be responsible to keep themselves clean u no, take ur time and wash it. no half way work.
I’m uncut, before I settled down I had my share of fun.
Newsflash, I’ve been with women and they didn’t notice. So if have had your share of hooking up, good chance you had one and didn’t know. Mine looks circumcised when erect.
I even dated a Jewish girl after we had sex for the first time, I asked if she had a problem with it. It took her a couple second to realize what I was talking about pointing to it. I remember her words “That’s the big deal”
As far as Hygiene I take a shower or 2 every day. Cut or Uncut a guy who doesn’t wash is going to have funk.
Another thing I’ve been told is I’m more sensitive than other guys when I starting intercourse. I don’t have to told to stop or slow down as much, I can feel it.
It’s totally a cultural Quirk…
As an uncut British guy, the issue rarely comes up given that most of us are uncut here. I happen to have very strong views on the subject, but that’s not what I want to talk about here. The nonsense spoken about hygiene and infections have been dealt with very well by other people.
However, I have to say that anyone – male of female – who decided not to have sex with someone because they were uncut, is the last person on earth I would want to have sex with. Presumably they were attracted to the man before they found out he was uncut, but all that disappears because he has a foreskin? Bizarre and shallow.
Personally I don’t find cut penises particularly attractive, but the guys attached to them are far more important.
I wonder what women would think if the whole world suddenly maintained that only huge, fake breasts were attractive and every other breast was ugly and to be shunned and any woman who didn’t immediately rush off to have her body surgically modified was a freak and unworthy of any sexual or romantic interest?
Oh wait a minute…..
Hi, i’m uncut and i’m happy about it.
However i am currently dating an american girl and we had a talk about sex and such. And as soon as i told her i had a foreskin she looked at me like i was filth =( she didnt even want to talk to me for days after that. Luckily her friend talked to her about guys who are uncut and she now finnally sees that it doesnt matter. Before her friend talked to her she thought of my junk as the most disgusting thing in the world =/. But now she is actually interested in it because i am the first guy she knows with one.
I have read articles about this for awhile and honestly? There isnt much of a difference between each. When hard both penises work the same. Circumcision has been proven IN THE USA to actually not make a huge difference when it came to STDs. The man just needs to clean is all, not a hard thing to do.
A message to ladies out there, if your guy is uncut or cut dont make him feel miserable about it =/. If it’s uncut, it’s natural thats how it’s supposed to be, if you love the guy it shouldnt matter. If it’s cut. They didnt really have a choice in the matter most likely and it was cut after birth. If you dont like uncut then thats your opinion, but really…would you like it to have your clit and labia cut? Because in some countries that do female circumsicion. They use the exact same excuses we do when it comes to it.
In Short:
1: Dont make your guy feel miserable about his junk. It’s terrible and it’s not your right to destroy his self esteem like that.
2: Cut or Uncut doesnt make a difference. Both feel and look different to women. But there is no real pro or con about either.
If a woman is turned off by an intact (uncut) penis, that seems pretty shallow. That’s like a guy being turned off by an uncircumcised vagina or breasts that haven’t been “enhanced”. An intact penis is how nature intended. The foreskin protects the sensitivity of the glans, which helps with the man’s sexual pleasure, and can arguably help the woman enjoy sex too, as the man won’t have to thrust as hard to reach orgasm.
I had a bad experience with a guy who was not circumcised and when i pulled the skin back,he had white sour smelling stuff all over his penis…UHHH!!
heyy umm im uncut and i live in america.. all my friends r cut i think… should i get it cut?
JH: If you don’t have any problems with your penis, there is absolutely no good reason to get a circumcision. Whether or not any of your friends are circumcised has no bearing at all on that.
JH if after reading all these posts you still don’t actually understand the implications of a cut dick then get it cut and live with the consequences good luck with no sensation, and you better purcahse lots of lubrication because you are going to need lots for the new mutilated dick! Good Luck!
I’m a British guy and of course – uncut. I thought I’d chip in over preferences here. I’ve never been with a guy who is circumcised. Personally, I don’t like the look of a cut penis and I’m sorry to say, but I find it a bit of a turn-off. Uncut is so much more fun and more better looking in my opinion. Plus us uncut guys have all the extra sensitivity intact!
REALLY interesting topic! i’ve only been with 6 men – all circumsized. i’m 31 years old – american born - and i’ve never even seen one uncircumsized. i just looked up images online to see what all the fuss is about. yes, they definitely look different but i agree with the ilk of pople who say that looks are not important in the scheme of things. it’s HOW a man is as a lover. size doesn’t even matter nearly as much as most men fear it does. and in my experience, guys with bigger penises are usually over confident (hence the term “cocky”) and don’t try as hard to please you. anyway, that said, i have recently become enamored of a man from england. it didn’t even occur to me, but now i’m thinking he might be uncircumsized. this does not bother me at all but some advice maybe? do you have to use a different technique for giving head? what should i know? i’m about to make my move and i just want to be able to make sure i can please him…
To brandy – This is where you get to have some fun :) You can use the foreskin and glide it back and forth over the head whilst you are giving him a blowjob for extra pleasure. Also you can try tonguing the frenulum (the little piece of skin that holds the foreskin to the head) which is very pleasurable. Also giving a handjob is very easy, just use the foreskin. No lube required!
I’ve been with both. All I can say is that if I lived in Europe and wanted to date, I would chase down every single Jewish male I could find. Otherwise, I would be stuck with masturbation the rest of my life; however, one should use a condom anyway, but if I had a man I wanted to give oral to . . . . oh god, I don’t even want to think about it!
After reading all of the comments, i just had to add my own opinion. I’m 40 years old and just had my first uncut lover this year. Before this summer, I had never even seen an uncircumcised penis. When my son was born, I argued against circumcising him, but my (now-ex) husband argued that he did not want his son to feel different and be picked on in the locker room. In hindsight, I wish I had held my ground, but I doubt I would have won the argument either way. I would not have had any issue teaching my son proper hygiene, and I am a firm believer that hygiene is important whether you are cut or uncut, for both men and women.
As for all of the argument between those that are and those that aren’t, it comes down to the same thing it does for every other difference in the world. American or not, women (and men too I’m sure) are afraid or uneasy at best, about things that are different from others. If someone has an extra toe or big ears or is shorter in height than average or whatever makes them different, there is someone who will be grossed out or turned off by that, and there are people who will make fun of it. The human species for all of their intelligence that makes them “better” than every other species of animal on earth, can be very ignorant and stupid and immature. Accept others as they are and if you cannot love them as they are, then they aren’t the right person for you, but there is no need to put them down for what is different.
Now to answer the original question that FBC asked. I’ve now been with both. I’ve had guys who were cut and very good in bed, and others who could care less about pleasing a woman. I fell in love with my uncut man before I ever knew he was uncut. Aside from worrying a little about whether I could hurt him or if I would need to do something different to pleasure him, it was of no concern to me. To all of you guys out there who are worried about what the girl will think, relax and if the girl is that shallow that she would fall in love and then out of love over something like, then you are better off without her.
For me personally, I enjoyed my uncut guy more than most of the cut guys i’d been with, including a husband with whom i had 16 years of great sex with, but couldn’t get along with outside of bed. I can remember several guys over the years that I would get sore or tired of waiting for them to cum because they had less sensitivity and took too long to finish. There is definitely something to be said for the extra sensitivity of an uncut man. My uncut lover can feel it when I kegel and squeeze around him, and feels more when I cum. For years I would try to squeeze/kegel to get my husband to feel it, and he couldn’t feel anything. If a guy has to ask if you orgasmed, and couldn’t feel it, he has lost something. I happen to be very vocal, so for some guys that would be the indication that she has orgasmed, but seriously most girls can fake the sound part of it.
For all of you women, when it is hard, there is very little difference in the way it looks, and the skin did not get in the way when performing oral. A hard cock looks about the same either way, though I was once with a guy whose cock bent downward because his circumcision was so tight, and it would actually hurt him to have sex in common positions. A flaccid circumcised penis isn’t very appealing, and to be honest, uncircumcised looks better when flaccid.
Based on my own experience, I now prefer uncut, but until I actually was able to experience it myself, I had no idea of the difference. Don’t knock it until you’ve tried it.
After reading all of the comments, i just had to add my own opinion. I’m 40 years old and just had my first uncut lover this year. Before this summer, I had never even seen an uncircumcised penis. When my son was born, I argued against circumcising him, but my (now-ex) husband argued that he did not want his son to feel different and be picked on in the locker room. In hindsight, I wish I had held my ground, but I doubt I would have won the argument either way. I would not have had any issue teaching my son proper hygiene, and I am a firm believer that hygiene is important whether you are cut or uncut, for both men and women.
As for all of the argument between those that are and those that aren’t, it comes down to the same thing it does for every other difference in the world. American or not, women (and men too I’m sure) are afraid or uneasy at best, about things that are different from others. If someone has an extra toe or big ears or is shorter in height than average or whatever makes them different, there is someone who will be grossed out or turned off by that, and there are people who will make fun of it. The human species for all of their intelligence that makes them “better” than every other species of animal on earth, can be very ignorant and stupid and immature. Accept others as they are and if you cannot love them as they are, then they aren’t the right person for you, but there is no need to put them down for what is different.
Now to answer the original question that FBC asked. I’ve now been with both. I’ve had guys who were cut and very good in bed, and others who could care less about pleasing a woman. I fell in love with my uncut man before I ever knew he was uncut. Aside from worrying a little about whether I could hurt him or if I would need to do something different to pleasure him, it was of no concern to me. To all of you guys out there who are worried about what the girl will think, relax and if the girl is that shallow that she would fall in love and then out of love over something like, then you are better off without her.
For me personally, I enjoyed my uncut guy more than most of the cut guys i’d been with, including a husband with whom i had 16 years of great sex with, but couldn’t get along with outside of bed. I can remember several guys over the years that I would get sore or tired of waiting for them to cum because they had less sensitivity and took too long to finish. There is definitely something to be said for the extra sensitivity of an uncut man. My uncut lover can feel it when I kegel and squeeze around him, and feels more when I cum. For years I would try to squeeze/kegel to get my husband to feel it, and he couldn’t feel anything. If a guy has to ask if you orgasmed, and couldn’t feel it, he has lost something. I happen to be very vocal, so for some guys that would be the indication that she has orgasmed, but seriously most girls can fake the sound part of it.
For all of you women, when it is hard, there is very little difference in the way it looks, and the skin did not get in the way when performing oral. A hard cock looks about the same either way, though I was once with a guy whose cock bent downward because his circumcision was so tight, and it would actually hurt him to have sex in common positions. A flaccid circumcised penis isn’t very appealing, and to be honest, uncircumcised looks better when flaccid.
Based on my own experience, I now prefer uncut, but until I actually was able to experience it myself, I had no idea of the difference. Don’t knock it until you’ve tried it.
ill take uncut anyday im cut and i wish i wasnt… i love the foreskin, yummie!!!!!!!!!!
its obvious that having you forskin removed that the sesititvity will be alot less has the bell end is permanantley in contact with other surfaces..like underware and mybe ur leg or watevea.. i know 2 guys who paid to be cut and say its the biggest mistakes of there lives, at first sensitivity was increased dramatically cos of the permanent exposure of the head of the penis but after maybe 6 weeks the sensitivity and the pleasure was nothing when uncut.. has the survey below and many other surveys show
maybe cut is more pleasing to the eye, but i think the pleasure and sensitvitry should be put first
also i read that most americans are cut at birth and they wouldnt have it any other way, well they say that cos they havent experiencedc being uncut and would defo change their minds if they had the chance
appearence v sensitivity/pleasure = sensivity/pleasure wins everytime by a millian miles
it reduces penile sensitivity by 75% – as shown by the latest and most comprehensive medical testing in 2007 (BJU International April – Sorrells research)
I have been reading about circumcision since I was a child. I am now 45. I have friends that are not cut and I have experimented with them in order to find out what the real differences are. I conclude that circumcision removes a significant amount of erogenous tissue. I have found that the frenulum and the mucosal tissue are what makes sex feel enjoyable. All a man has to do, is to encircirle his index finger and thumb around his erect penis and rub up and down from the corona of the glans to the base of the penis and he will quickly realize that the mucosal tissue, or, pink skin is the sensitive part. Now, consider that circumcision has removed half, or, more of this tissue. Circumcision obviously is a desensitizing procedure and to add insult to injury, it leaves scars behind to remind the the knowledgeable male of his misfortune. The average routine neonatal circumcision is considerably more desentizing than a type 1 FGM procedure. One does not have to be a doctor to figure this out. What we need are better restoration techniques for men that desire a more natural look. This may include a combination of surgical and nonsurgical methods. Such methods may bring about a nearly natural appearance and may greatly reduce the psychological trauma that results when many men and boys find out that part of their penises was removed, because, someone else thought it was better. It’s better to let the owner of the penis decide. The physical pain of an adult circumcision is nothing compared to the psychological pain that a great many men suffer as a result of ignorance and foolish tradition.
jeffrey.
I know American men who are not circumcised, so it is not fair to say that all Americans are circumsized.I prefer cut, because I absolutely hate suking on an uncut man.My husband is uncut….he is American.
am f i like foreskin a long foreskin it feels better when a guy is in there i like the up and down movemement of the skin.
Interesting how the blog’s owner is choosing to allow ignorant anti-foreskin comments. yet when an anti-clitoris comment made in jest is posted she chooses not to have it posted.
Quite a sexist woman, you’ve lost a reader (but what do you care right?)
I am a British woman with experience of both, and I prefer a man to be uncircumcised.
The main reasons for me are:
a)I find the look of a circumcised penis very unattractive
Wwhen hard, it is the combination of the way the skin on the head looks drier and the circumcision scar and when flaccid I just hate the way the head is always on view. TBH when I watch porn, if there is a penis shot and the guy is circumcised it actually makes me wince to look at it. I know a lot of US women feel the opposite way, and yes, I think the man is more important, but I can’t help the way I feel.
b) An uncircumcised man is far easier to masturbate.
I LIKE the look of the foreskin when soft and over the head, and I LOVE how soft it feels under your fingers and how easy it is to move it up and down. With the two circumcised men I’ve been with, I found that the one with the tight circ had no movement in the shaft skin at all, and normally used lube for masturbation, or he stroked the head dry, which, being used to uncircumcised men with super-sensitive heads I frankly found disturbing. The guy with the looser circumcision, I could not get the hang of, because he had enough skin to get some movement on the shaft when hard but just not quite enough to move it over the head, it just felt a bit wrong. Plus, he had real lack-of-sensitivity issues.
c) The foreskin is fun to play with
There are so many things you can do with it – up, down, insert a finger or tongue under it, gently massage it in circles, stroke the frenulum, etc.
d)If you are not lubricated enough, the foreskin itself provides movement, without friction which chafes.
This is true of vaginal sex when you dry up a bit (happens to all of us) and for anal too. It can also make entry easier. f I am a bit too dry, I can FEEL my boyfriend moving inside the foreskin.
e) Sensitivity
Sensitivity is not limited to uncircumcised men. It varies greatly from man to man, regardless of circ status. However, one study found that uncircumcised men had greater sensitivity to ‘fine touch’ and this is my experience. They are just more sensitive to extremely delicate movements, and you are less likely to have to apply much pressure.
Preference is individual. Uncircumcised is what I know best, and it is what I like best. I also happen to think the foreskin functions better with a foreskin. I don’t blame someone for preferring circumcised if that is what they are used to. I have large labia, and while some men love that, I know that to others it looks odd and unattractive. That is their prerogative.
However, I am very anti infant circumcision. I think every man has a right to make the circumcision decision for himself, and doing that to a baby is wrong – immoral. I don’t care if we have to make other decisions for our children – so what? There is no reason for infant circumcision, it could easily be left to the boy’s choice when he grows up.
Circumcised penises are not cleaner in my experience – the smelliest one I ever got near was actually one of my circumcised boyfriends, who thought it was ok to expect oral sex when he hadn’t washed in 24 hours. All the uncircumcised ones were careful about washing first.
And as for the health thing – well for each study showing circumcised men have lower rates of hpv, there is another study showing either no difference, or higher rates in circumcised males.
As for HIV – well, there are severe doubts about the African study, and other African studies have shown similar or higher rates of HIV in circumcised men. Similarly, if circumcision is such great protection against HIV, then why is HIV more prevalent in the US, a country where most men have historically been circumcised, than in Europe, where few men are circumcised? Male circumcision also offers no protection to female or male partners of the circumcised man, and one in five cases of HIV in Africa is now caught through medical causes rather than intercourse. Regardless of that, any possible protection against HIV should be of no consequence in Western countries with low infection rates, where men should be using condoms to protect themselves against other stds.
hello old or not we have to chat so we can talk about what u mean.am guy and will really like to know what u want to air out to.plz try to chat me danny_west2009@yahoo.com.
This discussion will really accomplish nothing. Parents and “some” physicans that want to line their pockets will do what they will do. I insist that we develop better solutions for men that dislike having part of their genitalia removed due to a religious procedure that goes under the guise of a legitimate medical procedure. Cutting off a perfectly healthy part of a baby’s body is simply wrong. We need need advancements in tissue engineering in order to restore the individual as much as possible, both physically and psychologically. We must be insane to do such a thing to innocent individuals. BTW, not all doctors are pro-circ.
jeffrey.
To all those of you that use the excuse that you Cut your son because the bible said you must, are you telling us that you believe G_d made a mistake, so you as humans must correct this mistake and cut off the foreskin, what a load of absolute BS!
I’m cut and I can tell you there’s really no benefit. I would much prefer to have a foreskin. I’m bi and I definitely prefer being with a natural guy; better for going down, better for handjobs and better all around. It’s NOT hard to clean and it doesn’t take any getting used to, unless you’ve lived under a rock.
Also, blogger, you say American guys are cut. That’s a gross overstatement. 45% of American guys aren’t cut….We just do it more often than others for really stupid reasons (mostly uneducated women and men who are ashamed of their own cut, so they do it to their kids to rationalize it).
Me & my daughters prefer circumcised customers.
Me & my daughters prefer circumcised customers. Cleaner to suck & give full orgasms till we squirt.
Natural male here, yeah that’s right, mine wasn’t butchered.
Women love me, because I take the time to get them off before I start, sometimes I can get them off 2-3 times. Finally I jump into the fray and give it hell! Ya know what? I find that just stopping a couple of times a little shy of ejaculation allows me to control it for hours if I want.
However I admit, I am very sensitive without a condomn, but I have had girls tell me that it feels so much better with the extra ridge that my foreskin makes as it is pushed back from insertion. Also sometimes it moves around back and forth with the motion, there are basically two things giving pleasure.. the foreskin and the glans.
HIV will be cured soon enough it can’t run rampant, and smegma .. it is as simple as cleaning in the shower in most cases every morning.
You cut guys out there though, you know… you have your advantages too, women should just enjoy themselves with both.
Who cares, enjoy enjoy enjoy and love what ya have… be glad ya have a penis.. they are fun.. women will eventually just replace us with dildos and we will have to use Japanese sex robots anyway.
everyone has made such interesting comments. but this last one… rich, the day that women replace men solely with dildos and men turn solely to japanese sex robots is the day i shoot myself in the face. sex is amazing. it is fun and pleasurable (aside from the functionality of procreation – i don’t even want kids myself). there are so many reasons to do and enjoy sex. but it’s not ALL about the orgasm. there is MUCH to be said about all the carnality. the flesh of another human being, the heat, the scent of someone else so close to you, the sweat, the noises we make, the kissing, touching… the passion. the sharing of it. you can’t get ANY of that with mechanical objects. we turn to those things in avoidance of the real thing then we have dehumanized ourselves completely. that’s like choosing to eat “hamburger pills” rather than actually eat a hamburger that’s readily available to us. i will tolerate no such thing. it’s like how the internet is a great invention and handy and an interesting way to communicate with people you normally wouldn’t get a chance to know but there are people out there that get so immersed in it, they would rather stay at home and IM people and chat online, rather than go out and have dinner with a friend in the flesh. this shit scares me. no sex robots! please! i’ll take a real man over a dildo ANY DAY! and by the way, i now know firsthand… i’ve been with 6 circumsized men and now one uncircumsized man. uncircumsized, in my opinion, IS better. i love the way the skin moves up and down on the shaft inside me. it’s so visceral and stimulating. this is the most intense sex i’ve ever had. then again, it’s also the person and how i feel about him and how he is with me and his technique and eagerness to please and his prowess. things i could never feel with a sex toy.
I am uncut and when i was younger i was embarrassed about it everyone in the change rooms i seen was cut,there was always a joke about it.So i learned to keep it quiet and hidden from any chance of being exposed.But as i got older i realized that the cut ones are the freaks of nature not me.
As far as keeping it clean i wash it as much as any body part i have,i read blogs about keeping it clean what the hell are you talking about it stays as clean as any other body part.If you have sex and dont wash it is just as dirty with a cut one, grow a brain.I dont go to the shower and only wash my cock lol,or forget to wash it either just because i am the way man was supposed to be doesnt mean i am stupid and forget to wash my cock.
As far as sex i think the women love it way more,every woman i have had sex with is converted to uncut.
I will list the reason it is way more smooth ,when it is hard you can still pull the skin over the head so during sex when going back and forth the skin moves over the head and adds extra smoothness resulting in extra throbs for both involved
It also has way more nerves so i feel everything resulting in more throbs
It also looks less used over the yrs,the head on a cut penis ends up looking old and used from no protection the head on my penis ,and i am 40,looks shiney and smooth and new
I also have a spot of nerves i guess on the bottom of my penis where skin that is so sensitive my wife can make me have an orgasm just lightly twisting it
I could go on and on any woman who doesnt like it hasnt had it that is for sure
Even though I am in my 50s and have been married for 21 years, I have recently discovered more about what my bits that circ would have discarded had I been cut in infancy, can do. Stroking the frenulum and the frenular delta with the fingertips can be a very potent form of foreplay. Playing with foreskin and frenulum allows her to milk me for precum, the best lubricant of all. The foreskin can capture and spread around the precum.
1-2 years ago, I heard a woman vlog on YouTube that “an uncut guy moves with you in way that’s heavenly.” Soon thereafter, I noticed that when going in and out, I do it time with her breathing. She pants faster, I go faster. I feel no need to go hard and fast merely so that I can feel something. My wife does not complain of being sore the next day.
I have met on the net an American woman whose sexual life story goes as follows. While working as a Candy Striper in high school, she accidentally witnessed an infant circumcision, and the experience was traumatic for her. Soon thereafter, she began her sex life, but found that it gave her no pleasure. For 2-3 years, she wondered if she was a lesbian. Then she had her first fling with an intact dude, and she finally climaxed. She dated more guys, but found that only intact did it for her. But because so few Baby Boomers like herself are intact, her dating life turned into total frustration. She is now menopausal and has never married. For years, she has gone to nude beaches summer after summer, to hunt for foreskin and to try to start a conversation with the owner. I asked this women point blank: “do cut guys penetrate too fast, too hard, and too deep?” She enthusiastically replied “YES! I could not have said it better.”
In the past year and a half, 3 men around my age have confided to me that their marital sex life is dead or dying, a fact they blame on their circumcisions. They have lost most or all feeling in the penis. I think we need to investigate carefully the possibility that some fraction of circumcised men loose interest in sex after age 40 or 50. The circumcised penis can becomes like a felt tip pen left to lie around with the cap off. One of these men last made love to his wife 15 years ago. For my part, 15-20 years ago, I was more sensitive than I would have liked. I am now barely sensitive enough. If I were cut, I think that I too would be at risk of being like my cut friends, of finding vaginal boring.
A great problem is that sex research is done by middle class Americans who are either themselves circumcised or the spouses of circumcised men. Hence sex research has been blind to the importance of the tender bits circ removes. Foreigners don’t do meticulous sex research, and also take the foreskin for granted. The result is that learning about the sexual role of the foreskin and frenulum has been a long uphill battle. The human body does not come with a User’s Manual!
The British and American middle class fell in love with infant circ at a time when:
1. No local anesthesia was available, and general anesthesia was a lot more dangerous than it is nowadays. So anesthesia was dispensed with.
2. There were no antibiotics if the wound became infected.
3. There were no clamps, so circ was done freehand, which greatly increases the risk of surgical accidents.
4. There was no circumstraint device for immobilizing the baby. A nurse or a parent had to restrain the baby’s arm and legs during the unanesthetized operation. This greatly increased the risk of surgical accidents.
A number of circs done before the 1980s cut so much off that erection and sexual pleasure in adulthood were impaired.
Routine infant circumcision results in the rare serious accident, even death. We do not know the truth about how often this occurs, because death certificates typically do not mention that the ultimate cause of death was circumcision.
All in all, I find the American love affair with circ not only weird because it is blind to how passion is supposed to work, but also downright irresponsible.
Tracy and Jo R, your posts were very very interesting. We need more detailed reports from women who have had both kinds of penises, without a condom (an experience I cannot advise).
I am 57 and intact and grew up fearful and lonely in the heartland of universal circumcision: the interior of the USA. I will now comment on each part of J R’s long post.
a) Most women find attractive penises that look like what they saw on their brothers and their first BFs.
b) Intact is easier to masturbate. Soooooo true!! Handjobs are so easy that BJs are not really needed. The American fascination with the BJ is an unintended consequence of circ.
c) I think that evolution not only finely crafted the foreskin to give pleasure during sex, it also has evolved women’s brains to want to play with it. In sex talk with my wife, I refer to the bits that circ removes as my “girl toys”!
d) The foreskin indeed makes vaginal intercourse smoother and less brutal. It also interacts very nicely with male precum to provide a well-lubricated experience.
e) Circ throws away the most sensitive parts of the male body. It is true that young natural guys can be very sensitive, and that this heightened sensitivity may require care and thought to work with and around. But it is possible that this sensitivity comes in very handy after 40 or 50 years of age. If sensitivity is fated to decline with age, the higher the starting level, the longer the active sex life.
Ladies, thank you for long and well thought posts. And may more ladies like yourselves come forward. Somebody should start a woman only blog on cut v. uncut.
First, I’ll introduce myself. I’ve never been to this site and don’t know exactly what it’s about. I reached this page directly from an internet search because I wanted to find out more information because this topic came up on a different website, I happened to be on. I had read nearly EVERY comment posted here and I wasn’t even going to respond but I fell I have to…
I grew up in the U.S.A. but I wasn’t born here, was born in Russia, came to the states when I was 5. Currently 24… My parents are Christian (I’m not though). I remain uncut and I’m very glad for this. I am VERY thankful my parents weren’t hardcore religion nuts. I need to make a few points on this subject:
1. Since when did ANYONE’s PERSONAL opinion/preference dictate anything? To the guy that says that women are “missing” out and everyone should be cut. I really hope you’re just some troll because people like you REALLY piss me off.
First you state “most” women, so obviously not ALL women prefer it that way. Secondly I can make a true statement by saying that “many” women prefer Men who are taller than 5 ft 10 inches. By your logic, anyone not up to this height standard “women would be missing out”. There are a lot of other examples I can bring up but I won’t, some like tall/fat/skinny/etc all of that is neither here nor there.
I can also state that “most” men prefer women who are “hot” or otherwise “gorgeous” obviously not EVERY women is a supermodel quality looks. So I can say that men are “missing” out everytime he sees a girl who’s overweight. And being overweight is something that can be a lot more EASILY controlled, than SURGICALLY removing body parts. (with the RARE exception of overweight genetics/diseases etc which is less than 1 percent of all cases)
Also to all the women here posting that you and your daughters prefer uncut. Great that’s YOUR preference but don’t automatically assume that everyone should be uncut. There are a lot of WOMEN and MEN who find tattoos “sexy” or whatever. I don’t see anyone here making the statement that infants should be tattooed or whatever from birth, you see where this is all leading?
Everything works TWO ways as well… for example, if you’re a woman and you ”prefer” a guy to be cut, be over 6 ft tall, be slim but muscular etc… You BETTER have something to offer in return or good luck to you…
For example, if you “prefer” a guy to be cut for “aesthetic” or pleasurable reasons or whatever your excuse is. Are you overweight? IMHO, being overweight even moderately is a HUGE turnoff and far worse than a little skin on some penis. Are you average or below average intelligence? How many languages do you speak? etc etc etc.
We’re all going to have faults one way or another. Personally I prefer women with an IQ that’s SIGNIFICANTLY higher than the average, doesn’t mean I’m ALWAYS going to get that. I’m sure we can all sit here and pick apart “unattractive” qualities from each other and find a reason to not be with someone.
There are a number of women that find it sexy that I’m fluent in two languages! I know English a lot better but my Russian is very good. PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE don’t impose your preferences on “others” (not accusing anyone in particular, just making a general statement here)
If you’re uncut look at the facts before making any “rash” decisions. Just because a few women don’t like it or don’t prefer it, don’t modify your body solely for that reason. (they are probably not worth it to begin with but allow me to explain further)…
We’ve all met various women/men etc in our lifetimes. (I’m straight btw) There are a number of American White women who will ONLY date black guys, there are a number of white women who will ONLY date white/european men. Conversely, there are others who prefer one over the other but still date both. I’ve met African American women who will only date white guys or only date African American men.
I hope we can all agree that in this day and age that if you’re white/black/asian/hispanic etc you are not in any way DEFICIENT. Accept that fact that there are PLENTY of WOMEN and MEN who will not date you because of your race (no matter what it is) it’s not that they are always “racist” or whatever. It’s their preference on what THEY are ATTRACTED to. Just like you’re going to be more attracted to skinny girls, chubby girls, muscular men or fat men etc and you may have a preference on race.
Cut/uncut should be a personal choice IMO and not imposed. If some girl is turned off that I’m uncut so be it. Just like another girl could be turned off because I’m not short enough, tall enough, I’m not Asian, or Black, Or hispanic etc etc etc. I’m not deficient, nasty, smelly etc for being uncut, anymore than I’m deficient because I was Russian born. I maintain good hygeine.
Honestly… It’s very sad that I even had to type this out. So a few girls were turned off or dumped you big ******** deal. How many women TURNED you OFF? Just because you can control it doesn’t mean you should change. If some girl wanted you to get a tattoo to make yourself more “visually” appealing! Doesn’t mean you automatically should run out and get one. You “could” if you WANTED to but for your own sake don’t let a WOMEN or MAN control YOUR LIFE OR YOUR BODY!
I’ve said enough on this long rant, feedback is appreciated.
I was uncut for 25yrs and I had problems explaining to my muslim girl friends who prefer mine to be cut. One day, one of my muslim gf talked to me to get an opinion from a doctor. I had a shock when they took my gf and me straight to the room where all was prepared for mine to be cut. My gf give me all the support for me to agree for the cut and she helped the other nurses who were helping the doctor during the cutting procedure.My gf was very helpful during the healing period and we both celebrated the first intercourse after the cut and she did a great blow job on me. My gf said it felt better after being cut which also keeps the glands of my penis clean!
I am American and uncut. I’m 28 years old. I used to be sort of embarrassed about having foreskin until I grew up and realized that we are born with the extra skin for a reason. No one should have to feel like a freak for being a natural man. If anything, having a cut penis should be considered bizarre. Being clean is a non-issue. The only way an uncut penis could become gross is if you simply don’t shower and why would anyone date someone who doesn’t shower? Cut, or uncut, EVERYONE washes their penis and scrotum. Again, that’s really a non-issue. As someone said before, are you gonna cut your hands off since their bound to get dirty? THINK.
I am proud to be uncircumcised and I wouldn’t have it any other way. Circumcision is a barbaric and painful procedure and completely unnecessary. Why put a child through horrific pain when there is no true benefit?
If I ever have a male child I will most certainly keep in tact. It’s as nature intended or else we wouldn’t be born with it.
I am American and uncut. I’m 28 years old. I used to be sort of embarrassed about having foreskin until I grew up and realized that we are born with the extra skin for a reason. No one should have to feel like a freak for being a natural man. If anything, having a cut penis should be considered bizarre. Being clean is a non-issue. The only way an uncut penis could become gross is if you simply don’t shower and why would anyone date someone who doesn’t shower? Cut, or uncut, EVERYONE washes their penis and scrotum. Again, that’s really a non-issue. As someone said before, are you gonna cut your hands off since their bound to get dirty? THINK.
I am proud to be uncircumcised and I wouldn’t have it any other way. Circumcision is a barbaric and painful procedure and completely unnecessary. Why put a child through horrific pain when there is no true benefit?
If I ever have a male child I will most certainly keep in tact. It’s as nature intended or else we wouldn’t be born with it.
<quote>
Metherline Briot Says:
January 27th, 2008 at 8:19 am
“I am slowly becoming gay because i got addicted to the sight and smell of an uncut dick. It makes me terribly horny. Any one there who can give me some therapy.I was cut when i was young and apparently i blame my parents for making me lose my foreskin.I am thinking about it all the time and feeling sorry for my self for not havin it. Please talk to me.”
<quote>
OMG are u serious? me too, I’m straight and masculine but for some strange reason uncut ones make me sooo fucken horny, I like to imagine my petite latina gf getting fucked by a really big uncircumcised cock, is there something wrong with me?
Honestly Ive seen both my boyfriend of four years is macedonian, uncut and I think it looks great and more natural. I think if anything the cut ones are the ugly ones. To compare think of it this way would I look prettier with my head shaved or with hair..with hair obviously.
Anyways uncut all the way baby !
If an uncut dick is much more sensitive, then it’s probably best that I’m circumsized.
I don’t think I could take any more sensitivity – it already jumps up over almost anything, and I’m no kid, I’m 46 years old.
I mean, I get dizzy from all the sensation when my girlfriend takes my cock in her mouth.
Sounds like heart attack city if I was uncut.
← Previous Comments