The foreskin is the expansion joint of the penis, in that it supplies the extra skin needed to accommodate erection. As is the case with many intact men, erection makes my foreskin disappear. Some boys I grew up with struck me as having no loose skin while flaccid. I wondered how they could have comfortable erections, much less enjoy sex. From what some cut men have posted here and there on the internet, my concern was well taken.

The foreskin prevents the glans from gradually drying out and losing most or all sensation. I gather that many American men cease having sex in their 50s. The first suspect that should be investigated is the extinction of sexual sensation resulting from mucus membranes being in contact with underwear for decades following an infant circumcision.

The bits removed by circ facilitate her doing foreplay on him with her fingers instead of her mouth. I now argue that the American fascination with oral sex is an iatrogenic consequence of routine circumcision. Once upon a time, oral sex used to be the specialty of sex workers. It entered the USA mainstream in the 1950s, when the typical American teenage boy became circumcised. Furtive oral sex with an intact man is not pleasant, because furtive rules out his rinsing off before letting her initiate oral. Circ facilitates the quick BJ anywhere after dark.
Sex sessions with my wife begin with our doing finger foreplay on each other. She carefully strokes my frenulum and kneads the frenular delta, the part of the inner foreskin that anchors the frenulum. Playing with foreskin stimulates precum. The moving foreskin then spreads the precum around to where it can be effective. The whole combination of precum and foreskin makes for a very inviting package for vaginal insertion. I should grant that my wife uses a dab of KY even with intact yours truly.  After 30-45 minutes of this, we switch to vaginal intercourse. We are so wet and so excited that she comes in 5 minutes and I in 10.

Foreskin helps initial penetration and the moving foreskin cushions the thrusting. Because there are a lot more nerve endings in contact with the vaginal wall, an intact man does not need to thrust fast and hard to obain pleasure. He is happy going no faster than he or she breathes. Meanwhile, cut men are able to thrust too fast, too hard, and too deep. A woman sex radical devoted a YouTube video to a certain style of vaginal intercourse popular among insensitive young men, which she called “Power f—ing,” and described as thrusting as fast as possible from the very outset. No gradual buildup. This loathesome activity is distasteful and unnatural to an intact man.
After age 45 or so, if I don’t use a condom, my wife regularly climaxes several times before I do. When I finally do climax, it is together with her final time. We do not have the timing and premature issues that seem to plague so many USA marriages.

The foreskin greatly facilitates intercourse between the upper thighs, foot jobs, and in the breast cleavage. These activities are no longer important to me, but are harmless and float some boats.

The greater sensitivity of intact men can seem excessive before age 30 or 40. But I believe that the intact penis really comes into its own in middle age (I am 57).

To research this post, I browsed Craigslist, whose gay matching ads routinely mention a preference for uncut men. This confirmed that gay men indeed are the great American foreskin connaisseurs, and as such could surely extend this discussion. Only a handful of straight men mention they are uncut. Women looking for men never express a preference. But I predict that some will by 2020! Straight porn, unlike the gay kind, seldom does justice to what the foreskin can do, but that too could change over the next 10 years or so.
The following link is to a YouTube video where Paula Young, and intelligent women and the mother of a 26 year old son, says black on white that sex with an intact penis is much better:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlFI9zDZ_bY
Somebody should open a YouTube channel devoted to women’s testimonials of the advantages of intact and restored.
In the documentary film “Cut,” the wife of Ron Low, the inventor and manufacturer of the most popular foreskin restoration device, explained how her marital sex life improved when her husband restored his foreskin. She was very much the wife next door type. You could tell that she was not used to articulating her sex life, much less doing so on camera. Nevertheless, I sensed that she felt that what she had to say advanced a good cause. So she swallowed hard, blushed, and the words came out, not easily but with a sweet smile. After her husband restored, vaginal intercourse felt a good deal better, and they were at last able to climax together. We need more testimonials of this nature.

I should grant that many American women report that vaginal sex feels the same whether or not he’s cut. Others report that since they only interact with erect penises, they have not noticed whether any of their partners have been uncut. Two American women have written books on the pleasures of the intact penis, but I cannot endorse either one. We need more research, including more careful interviews of women by sophisticated women. The Hite Report was woefully inadequate here.

If what I write here is broadly true of a fair number of women, there is a time bomb ticking under American routine neonatal circumcision. It’s not a matter of IF but only of WHEN.
Finally, an explosive feminist issue. I have recently come to suspect that circ facilitates rape. This began when I read that Scandinavian law enforcement authorities are quietly disclosing that the vast majority of rapes in their countries are committed by circumcised Moslem immigrants. A hard fact from my experience is that I can neither penetrate nor move inside a dry vagina. My ridged band and retracted foreskin catch and snag on her vaginal wall, putting very unpleasant tension on my frenulum. Not only is this very unpleasant for her, it is downright painful for me. If her vagina is not nice and wet, I simply cannot perform. I suspect that this stricture is less true of cut men.
The following post is from a mother’s blog:
http://www.drmomma.org/2009/07/how-male-circumcision-impacts-women.html
Most of that link consists of useful links to points of view related to this post. However, I reserve judgement on the potted summary of Kristen O’Hara’s conclusions. The second comment on this drmomma post, by “Anonymous,” is typical of the warm praise of the intact penis some American women express on the net.

I don’t think I could take any more sensitivity – it already jumps up over almost anything, and I’m no kid, I’m 46 years old.

I mean, I get dizzy from all the sensation when my girlfriend takes my cock in her mouth.

Sounds like heart attack city if I was uncut.

Anyways uncut all the way baby !

Metherline Briot Says:

January 27th, 2008 at 8:19 am

“I am slowly becoming gay because i got addicted to the sight and smell of an uncut dick. It makes me terribly horny. Any one there who can give me some therapy.I was cut when i was young and apparently i blame my parents for making me lose my foreskin.I am thinking about it all the time and feeling sorry for my self for not havin it. Please talk to me.”
<quote>
 
OMG are u serious? me too, I’m straight and masculine but for some strange reason uncut ones make me sooo fucken horny, I like to  imagine my petite latina gf getting fucked by a really big uncircumcised cock, is there something wrong with me?
 

I am proud to be uncircumcised and I wouldn’t have it any other way. Circumcision is a barbaric and painful procedure and completely unnecessary. Why put a child through horrific pain when there is no true benefit?

If I ever have a male child I will most certainly keep in tact. It’s as nature intended or else we wouldn’t be born with it.