Comments on: Penises: Cut vs. Uncut http://funkybrownchick.com/2006/12/11/penises-cut-vs-uncut/ Twanna is a sex, dating and relationships writer in New York City. She's funky. She has brown skin. And, she's a chick. FUNKYBROWNCHICK™ chronicles her life. Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:40:21 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Alex http://funkybrownchick.com/2006/12/11/penises-cut-vs-uncut/comment-page-6/#comment-127545 Alex Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:55:19 +0000 http://funkybrownchick.com/2006/12/11/penises-cut-vs-uncut/#comment-127545 I know American men who are not circumcised, so it is not fair to say that all Americans are circumsized.I prefer cut, because I absolutely hate suking on an uncut man.My husband is uncut....he is American. I know American men who are not circumcised, so it is not fair to say that all Americans are circumsized.I prefer cut, because I absolutely hate suking on an uncut man.My husband is uncut….he is American.

]]> By: jeffrey http://funkybrownchick.com/2006/12/11/penises-cut-vs-uncut/comment-page-6/#comment-127271 jeffrey Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:14:17 +0000 http://funkybrownchick.com/2006/12/11/penises-cut-vs-uncut/#comment-127271 I have been reading about circumcision since I was a child. I am now 45. I have friends that are not cut and I have experimented with them in order to find out what the real differences are. I conclude that circumcision removes a significant amount of erogenous tissue. I have found that the frenulum and the mucosal tissue are what makes sex feel enjoyable. All a man has to do, is to encircirle his index finger and thumb around his erect penis and rub up and down from the corona of the glans to the base of the penis and he will quickly realize that the mucosal tissue, or, pink skin is the sensitive part. Now, consider that circumcision has removed half, or, more of this tissue. Circumcision obviously is a desensitizing procedure and to add insult to injury, it leaves scars behind to remind the the knowledgeable male of his misfortune. The average routine neonatal circumcision is considerably more desentizing than a type 1 FGM procedure. One does not have to be a doctor to figure this out. What we need are better restoration techniques for men that desire a more natural look. This may include a combination of surgical and nonsurgical methods. Such methods may bring about a nearly natural appearance and may greatly reduce the psychological trauma that results when many men and boys find out that part of their penises was removed, because, someone else thought it was better. It's better to let the owner of the penis decide. The physical pain of an adult circumcision is nothing compared to the psychological pain that a great many men suffer as a result of ignorance and foolish tradition. jeffrey. I have been reading about circumcision since I was a child. I am now 45. I have friends that are not cut and I have experimented with them in order to find out what the real differences are. I conclude that circumcision removes a significant amount of erogenous tissue. I have found that the frenulum and the mucosal tissue are what makes sex feel enjoyable. All a man has to do, is to encircirle his index finger and thumb around his erect penis and rub up and down from the corona of the glans to the base of the penis and he will quickly realize that the mucosal tissue, or, pink skin is the sensitive part. Now, consider that circumcision has removed half, or, more of this tissue. Circumcision obviously is a desensitizing procedure and to add insult to injury, it leaves scars behind to remind the the knowledgeable male of his misfortune. The average routine neonatal circumcision is considerably more desentizing than a type 1 FGM procedure. One does not have to be a doctor to figure this out. What we need are better restoration techniques for men that desire a more natural look. This may include a combination of surgical and nonsurgical methods. Such methods may bring about a nearly natural appearance and may greatly reduce the psychological trauma that results when many men and boys find out that part of their penises was removed, because, someone else thought it was better. It’s better to let the owner of the penis decide. The physical pain of an adult circumcision is nothing compared to the psychological pain that a great many men suffer as a result of ignorance and foolish tradition.

jeffrey.

]]> By: john mack http://funkybrownchick.com/2006/12/11/penises-cut-vs-uncut/comment-page-6/#comment-126721 john mack Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:30:59 +0000 http://funkybrownchick.com/2006/12/11/penises-cut-vs-uncut/#comment-126721 its obvious that having you forskin removed that the sesititvity will be alot less has the bell end is permanantley in contact with other surfaces..like underware and mybe ur leg or watevea.. i know 2 guys who paid to be cut and say its the biggest mistakes of there lives, at first sensitivity was increased dramatically cos of the permanent exposure of the head of the penis but after maybe 6 weeks the sensitivity and the pleasure was nothing when uncut.. has the survey below and many other surveys show maybe cut is more pleasing to the eye, but i think the pleasure and sensitvitry should be put first also i read that most americans are cut at birth and they wouldnt have it any other way, well they say that cos they havent experiencedc being uncut and would defo change their minds if they had the chance appearence v sensitivity/pleasure = sensivity/pleasure wins everytime by a millian miles it reduces penile sensitivity by 75% - as shown by the latest and most comprehensive medical testing in 2007 (BJU International April - Sorrells research) its obvious that having you forskin removed that the sesititvity will be alot less has the bell end is permanantley in contact with other surfaces..like underware and mybe ur leg or watevea.. i know 2 guys who paid to be cut and say its the biggest mistakes of there lives, at first sensitivity was increased dramatically cos of the permanent exposure of the head of the penis but after maybe 6 weeks the sensitivity and the pleasure was nothing when uncut.. has the survey below and many other surveys show

maybe cut is more pleasing to the eye, but i think the pleasure and sensitvitry should be put first

also i read that most americans are cut at birth and they wouldnt have it any other way, well they say that cos they havent experiencedc being uncut and would defo change their minds if they had the chance

appearence v sensitivity/pleasure = sensivity/pleasure wins everytime by a millian miles
it reduces penile sensitivity by 75% – as shown by the latest and most comprehensive medical testing in 2007 (BJU International April – Sorrells research)

]]> By: JR http://funkybrownchick.com/2006/12/11/penises-cut-vs-uncut/comment-page-6/#comment-126620 JR Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:37:31 +0000 http://funkybrownchick.com/2006/12/11/penises-cut-vs-uncut/#comment-126620 ill take uncut anyday im cut and i wish i wasnt... i love the foreskin, yummie!!!!!!!!!! ill take uncut anyday im cut and i wish i wasnt… i love the foreskin, yummie!!!!!!!!!!

]]> By: Tracy http://funkybrownchick.com/2006/12/11/penises-cut-vs-uncut/comment-page-6/#comment-123409 Tracy Sun, 25 Oct 2009 00:26:08 +0000 http://funkybrownchick.com/2006/12/11/penises-cut-vs-uncut/#comment-123409 After reading all of the comments, i just had to add my own opinion.  I'm 40 years old and just had my first uncut lover this year.  Before this summer, I had never even seen an uncircumcised penis.  When my son was born, I argued against circumcising him, but my (now-ex) husband argued that he did not want his son to feel different and be picked on in the locker room.  In hindsight, I wish I had held my ground, but I doubt I would have won the argument either way.  I would not have had any issue teaching my son proper hygiene, and I am a firm believer that hygiene is important whether you are cut or uncut, for both men and women.  As for all of the argument between those that are and those that aren't, it comes down to the same thing it does for every other difference in the world.  American or not, women (and men too I'm sure) are afraid or uneasy at best, about things that are different from others.  If someone has an extra toe or big ears or is shorter in height than average or whatever makes them different, there is someone who will be grossed out or turned off by that, and there are people who will make fun of it.  The human species for all of their intelligence that makes them "better" than every other species of animal on earth, can be very ignorant and stupid and immature.  Accept others as they are and if you cannot love them as they are, then they aren't the right person for you, but there is no need to put them down for what is different.  Now to answer the original question that FBC asked.  I've now been with both.  I've had guys who were cut and very good in bed, and others who could care less about pleasing a woman.  I fell in love with my uncut man before I ever knew he was uncut.  Aside from worrying a little about whether I could hurt him or if I would need to do something different to pleasure him, it was of no concern to me.  To all of you guys out there who are worried about what the girl will think, relax and if the girl is that shallow that she would fall in love and then out of love over something like, then you are better off without her.  For me personally, I enjoyed my uncut guy more than most of the cut guys i'd been with, including a husband with whom i had 16 years of great sex with, but couldn't get along with outside of bed.  I can remember several guys over the years that I would get sore or tired of waiting for them to cum because they had less sensitivity and took too long to finish.  There is definitely something to be said for the extra sensitivity of an uncut man.  My uncut lover can feel it when I kegel and squeeze around him, and feels more when I cum.  For years I would try to squeeze/kegel to get my husband to feel it, and he couldn't feel anything.  If a guy has to ask if you orgasmed, and couldn't feel it, he has lost something.  I happen to be very vocal, so for some guys that would be the indication that she has orgasmed, but seriously most girls can fake the sound part of it.   For all of you women, when it is hard, there is very little difference in the way it looks, and the skin did not get in the way when performing oral.  A hard cock looks about the same either way, though I was once with a guy whose cock bent downward because his circumcision was so tight, and it would actually hurt him to have sex in common positions.  A flaccid circumcised penis isn't very appealing, and to be honest, uncircumcised looks better when flaccid.  Based on my own experience,  I now prefer uncut, but until I actually was able to experience it myself, I had no idea of the difference.  Don't knock it until you've tried it.  After reading all of the comments, i just had to add my own opinion.  I’m 40 years old and just had my first uncut lover this year.  Before this summer, I had never even seen an uncircumcised penis.  When my son was born, I argued against circumcising him, but my (now-ex) husband argued that he did not want his son to feel different and be picked on in the locker room.  In hindsight, I wish I had held my ground, but I doubt I would have won the argument either way.  I would not have had any issue teaching my son proper hygiene, and I am a firm believer that hygiene is important whether you are cut or uncut, for both men and women. 

As for all of the argument between those that are and those that aren’t, it comes down to the same thing it does for every other difference in the world.  American or not, women (and men too I’m sure) are afraid or uneasy at best, about things that are different from others.  If someone has an extra toe or big ears or is shorter in height than average or whatever makes them different, there is someone who will be grossed out or turned off by that, and there are people who will make fun of it.  The human species for all of their intelligence that makes them “better” than every other species of animal on earth, can be very ignorant and stupid and immature.  Accept others as they are and if you cannot love them as they are, then they aren’t the right person for you, but there is no need to put them down for what is different. 

Now to answer the original question that FBC asked.  I’ve now been with both.  I’ve had guys who were cut and very good in bed, and others who could care less about pleasing a woman.  I fell in love with my uncut man before I ever knew he was uncut.  Aside from worrying a little about whether I could hurt him or if I would need to do something different to pleasure him, it was of no concern to me.  To all of you guys out there who are worried about what the girl will think, relax and if the girl is that shallow that she would fall in love and then out of love over something like, then you are better off without her. 

For me personally, I enjoyed my uncut guy more than most of the cut guys i’d been with, including a husband with whom i had 16 years of great sex with, but couldn’t get along with outside of bed.  I can remember several guys over the years that I would get sore or tired of waiting for them to cum because they had less sensitivity and took too long to finish.  There is definitely something to be said for the extra sensitivity of an uncut man.  My uncut lover can feel it when I kegel and squeeze around him, and feels more when I cum.  For years I would try to squeeze/kegel to get my husband to feel it, and he couldn’t feel anything.  If a guy has to ask if you orgasmed, and couldn’t feel it, he has lost something.  I happen to be very vocal, so for some guys that would be the indication that she has orgasmed, but seriously most girls can fake the sound part of it.  

For all of you women, when it is hard, there is very little difference in the way it looks, and the skin did not get in the way when performing oral.  A hard cock looks about the same either way, though I was once with a guy whose cock bent downward because his circumcision was so tight, and it would actually hurt him to have sex in common positions.  A flaccid circumcised penis isn’t very appealing, and to be honest, uncircumcised looks better when flaccid. 
Based on my own experience,  I now prefer uncut, but until I actually was able to experience it myself, I had no idea of the difference.  Don’t knock it until you’ve tried it. 

]]> By: Tracy http://funkybrownchick.com/2006/12/11/penises-cut-vs-uncut/comment-page-6/#comment-123408 Tracy Sun, 25 Oct 2009 00:26:08 +0000 http://funkybrownchick.com/2006/12/11/penises-cut-vs-uncut/#comment-123408 After reading all of the comments, i just had to add my own opinion.  I'm 40 years old and just had my first uncut lover this year.  Before this summer, I had never even seen an uncircumcised penis.  When my son was born, I argued against circumcising him, but my (now-ex) husband argued that he did not want his son to feel different and be picked on in the locker room.  In hindsight, I wish I had held my ground, but I doubt I would have won the argument either way.  I would not have had any issue teaching my son proper hygiene, and I am a firm believer that hygiene is important whether you are cut or uncut, for both men and women.  As for all of the argument between those that are and those that aren't, it comes down to the same thing it does for every other difference in the world.  American or not, women (and men too I'm sure) are afraid or uneasy at best, about things that are different from others.  If someone has an extra toe or big ears or is shorter in height than average or whatever makes them different, there is someone who will be grossed out or turned off by that, and there are people who will make fun of it.  The human species for all of their intelligence that makes them "better" than every other species of animal on earth, can be very ignorant and stupid and immature.  Accept others as they are and if you cannot love them as they are, then they aren't the right person for you, but there is no need to put them down for what is different.  Now to answer the original question that FBC asked.  I've now been with both.  I've had guys who were cut and very good in bed, and others who could care less about pleasing a woman.  I fell in love with my uncut man before I ever knew he was uncut.  Aside from worrying a little about whether I could hurt him or if I would need to do something different to pleasure him, it was of no concern to me.  To all of you guys out there who are worried about what the girl will think, relax and if the girl is that shallow that she would fall in love and then out of love over something like, then you are better off without her.  For me personally, I enjoyed my uncut guy more than most of the cut guys i'd been with, including a husband with whom i had 16 years of great sex with, but couldn't get along with outside of bed.  I can remember several guys over the years that I would get sore or tired of waiting for them to cum because they had less sensitivity and took too long to finish.  There is definitely something to be said for the extra sensitivity of an uncut man.  My uncut lover can feel it when I kegel and squeeze around him, and feels more when I cum.  For years I would try to squeeze/kegel to get my husband to feel it, and he couldn't feel anything.  If a guy has to ask if you orgasmed, and couldn't feel it, he has lost something.  I happen to be very vocal, so for some guys that would be the indication that she has orgasmed, but seriously most girls can fake the sound part of it.   For all of you women, when it is hard, there is very little difference in the way it looks, and the skin did not get in the way when performing oral.  A hard cock looks about the same either way, though I was once with a guy whose cock bent downward because his circumcision was so tight, and it would actually hurt him to have sex in common positions.  A flaccid circumcised penis isn't very appealing, and to be honest, uncircumcised looks better when flaccid.  Based on my own experience,  I now prefer uncut, but until I actually was able to experience it myself, I had no idea of the difference.  Don't knock it until you've tried it.  After reading all of the comments, i just had to add my own opinion.  I’m 40 years old and just had my first uncut lover this year.  Before this summer, I had never even seen an uncircumcised penis.  When my son was born, I argued against circumcising him, but my (now-ex) husband argued that he did not want his son to feel different and be picked on in the locker room.  In hindsight, I wish I had held my ground, but I doubt I would have won the argument either way.  I would not have had any issue teaching my son proper hygiene, and I am a firm believer that hygiene is important whether you are cut or uncut, for both men and women. 

As for all of the argument between those that are and those that aren’t, it comes down to the same thing it does for every other difference in the world.  American or not, women (and men too I’m sure) are afraid or uneasy at best, about things that are different from others.  If someone has an extra toe or big ears or is shorter in height than average or whatever makes them different, there is someone who will be grossed out or turned off by that, and there are people who will make fun of it.  The human species for all of their intelligence that makes them “better” than every other species of animal on earth, can be very ignorant and stupid and immature.  Accept others as they are and if you cannot love them as they are, then they aren’t the right person for you, but there is no need to put them down for what is different. 

Now to answer the original question that FBC asked.  I’ve now been with both.  I’ve had guys who were cut and very good in bed, and others who could care less about pleasing a woman.  I fell in love with my uncut man before I ever knew he was uncut.  Aside from worrying a little about whether I could hurt him or if I would need to do something different to pleasure him, it was of no concern to me.  To all of you guys out there who are worried about what the girl will think, relax and if the girl is that shallow that she would fall in love and then out of love over something like, then you are better off without her. 

For me personally, I enjoyed my uncut guy more than most of the cut guys i’d been with, including a husband with whom i had 16 years of great sex with, but couldn’t get along with outside of bed.  I can remember several guys over the years that I would get sore or tired of waiting for them to cum because they had less sensitivity and took too long to finish.  There is definitely something to be said for the extra sensitivity of an uncut man.  My uncut lover can feel it when I kegel and squeeze around him, and feels more when I cum.  For years I would try to squeeze/kegel to get my husband to feel it, and he couldn’t feel anything.  If a guy has to ask if you orgasmed, and couldn’t feel it, he has lost something.  I happen to be very vocal, so for some guys that would be the indication that she has orgasmed, but seriously most girls can fake the sound part of it.  

For all of you women, when it is hard, there is very little difference in the way it looks, and the skin did not get in the way when performing oral.  A hard cock looks about the same either way, though I was once with a guy whose cock bent downward because his circumcision was so tight, and it would actually hurt him to have sex in common positions.  A flaccid circumcised penis isn’t very appealing, and to be honest, uncircumcised looks better when flaccid. 
Based on my own experience,  I now prefer uncut, but until I actually was able to experience it myself, I had no idea of the difference.  Don’t knock it until you’ve tried it. 

]]> By: tee http://funkybrownchick.com/2006/12/11/penises-cut-vs-uncut/comment-page-6/#comment-123212 tee Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:26:49 +0000 http://funkybrownchick.com/2006/12/11/penises-cut-vs-uncut/#comment-123212 I've been with both.  All I can say is that if I lived in Europe and wanted to date, I would chase down every single Jewish male I could find.  Otherwise, I would be stuck with masturbation the rest of my life; however, one should use a condom anyway, but if I had a man I wanted to give oral to . . . . oh god, I don't even want to think about it! I’ve been with both.  All I can say is that if I lived in Europe and wanted to date, I would chase down every single Jewish male I could find.  Otherwise, I would be stuck with masturbation the rest of my life; however, one should use a condom anyway, but if I had a man I wanted to give oral to . . . . oh god, I don’t even want to think about it!

]]> By: Jason http://funkybrownchick.com/2006/12/11/penises-cut-vs-uncut/comment-page-6/#comment-122426 Jason Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:48:21 +0000 http://funkybrownchick.com/2006/12/11/penises-cut-vs-uncut/#comment-122426 To brandy - This is where you get to have some fun :) You can use the foreskin and glide it back and forth over the head whilst you are giving him a blowjob for extra pleasure. Also you can try tonguing the frenulum (the little piece of skin that holds the foreskin to the head) which is very pleasurable. Also giving a handjob is very easy, just use the foreskin. No lube required! To brandy – This is where you get to have some fun :) You can use the foreskin and glide it back and forth over the head whilst you are giving him a blowjob for extra pleasure. Also you can try tonguing the frenulum (the little piece of skin that holds the foreskin to the head) which is very pleasurable. Also giving a handjob is very easy, just use the foreskin. No lube required!

]]> By: brandy http://funkybrownchick.com/2006/12/11/penises-cut-vs-uncut/comment-page-6/#comment-122304 brandy Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:15:34 +0000 http://funkybrownchick.com/2006/12/11/penises-cut-vs-uncut/#comment-122304 REALLY interesting topic!  i've only been with 6 men - all circumsized.  i'm 31 years old - american born - and i've never even seen one uncircumsized.  i just looked up images online to see what all the fuss is about.  yes, they definitely look different but i agree with the ilk of pople who say that looks are not important in the scheme of things.  it's HOW a man is as a lover.  size doesn't even matter nearly as much as most men fear it does.  and in my experience, guys with bigger penises are usually over confident (hence the term "cocky") and don't try as hard to please you.  anyway, that said, i have recently become enamored of a man from england.  it didn't even occur to me, but now i'm thinking he might be uncircumsized.  this does not bother me at all but some advice maybe?  do you have to use a different technique for giving head?  what should i know?  i'm about to make my move and i just want to be able to make sure i can please him...  REALLY interesting topic!  i’ve only been with 6 men – all circumsized.  i’m 31 years old – american born - and i’ve never even seen one uncircumsized.  i just looked up images online to see what all the fuss is about.  yes, they definitely look different but i agree with the ilk of pople who say that looks are not important in the scheme of things.  it’s HOW a man is as a lover.  size doesn’t even matter nearly as much as most men fear it does.  and in my experience, guys with bigger penises are usually over confident (hence the term “cocky”) and don’t try as hard to please you.  anyway, that said, i have recently become enamored of a man from england.  it didn’t even occur to me, but now i’m thinking he might be uncircumsized.  this does not bother me at all but some advice maybe?  do you have to use a different technique for giving head?  what should i know?  i’m about to make my move and i just want to be able to make sure i can please him… 

]]> By: Jason http://funkybrownchick.com/2006/12/11/penises-cut-vs-uncut/comment-page-6/#comment-122255 Jason Wed, 14 Oct 2009 01:11:26 +0000 http://funkybrownchick.com/2006/12/11/penises-cut-vs-uncut/#comment-122255 I'm a British guy and of course - uncut. I thought I'd chip in over preferences here. I've never been with a guy who is circumcised. Personally, I don't like the look of a cut penis and I'm sorry to say, but I find it a bit of a turn-off. Uncut is so much more fun and more better looking in my opinion. Plus us uncut guys have all the extra sensitivity intact! I’m a British guy and of course – uncut. I thought I’d chip in over preferences here. I’ve never been with a guy who is circumcised. Personally, I don’t like the look of a cut penis and I’m sorry to say, but I find it a bit of a turn-off. Uncut is so much more fun and more better looking in my opinion. Plus us uncut guys have all the extra sensitivity intact!

]]>